Both Of These Facets Make You Prone To Be Into Non-Monogamy | Autostraddle

Ready to accept new experiences? Not so scrupulous? Queer? You could be much more into consensual non-monogamy.

More individuals than ever before have non-monogamous connections, and new study sheds light on which elements make people — and particularly queer men and women — almost certainly going to be into them. A
study published a week ago inside

Log of Bisexuality

unearthed that more than every other personality facets or attachment designs, being more open (appreciative of several experience) much less conscientiousness (not very self-disciplined) can make queer men and women prone to feel favorably about and take part in consensually nonmonogamous connections.

For directly individuals, there is a link between attachment orientation and consensual nonmonogamy: people who find themselvesn’t super at ease with intimacy with somebody (the accessory avoidant) are more available to it; whereas individuals who are insecure about a partner’s availability, require reassurance, and are also scared of abandonment (the connection nervous) are much less ready to accept it.

But for queer men and women, its more difficult than that. Consensual nonmonogamous relationships are normal among queers, and social norms that way can affect perceptions or actions. In accordance with previous study observed from the writers, 35per cent of bisexual ladies and 21percent of lesbian ladies reported having used consensual non-monogamy, compared to 16percent of right women. And when you begin attain from a heteronormative union design, you are prone to get away from a mononormative connection model, also. Accessory elimination or anxiety is not the complete image; for queer men and women, society and personality are just what matter.

The research focused on just how character attributes — especially openness, conscientiousness, extraversion, agreeableness, and neuroticism — are linked to positive perceptions and tendency toward consensually non-monogamous interactions among sexual minorities. The authors recruited 108 LGB individuals on the web — 67% recognized as ladies, 62percent defined as bi- or pansexual, and 38% identified as gay or lesbian — to resolve concerns on the perceptions toward passionate connections.

The authors discovered that getting a lot more open produced individuals much more keen on consensual nonmonogamy, and write:

”[O]penness to brand-new experiences and conscientiousness happened to be robust predictors of interest to multiple-partner interactions among LGB people. Those who generally have active imaginations, an inclination for wide variety, and a proclivity to take part in new encounters (for example., saturated in openness) hold good perceptions toward CNM and better determination to take part in these interactions.”

While getting much more careful had a tendency to cause people to much less interested in consensual nonmonogamy:

”[I]ndividuals who are generally very organized, cool, careful, and success driven (i.e., full of conscientiousness) perceive CNM negatively and then have significantly less desire to participate in CNM. Also, considering the fact that highly conscientiousness people will deliberate, these people possess carefully considered exactly what these interactions embodied (i.e., believed carefully exactly how all the CNM-related product would play aside) before supplying their unique perceptions. Although we wouldn’t at first hypothesize this outcome, this finding is largely consistent with earlier investigation revealing low conscientiousness as robustly (and cross-culturally) involving curiosity about commitment nonexclusivity … Potentially, those rich in conscientiousness may view CNM interactions as having ill-defined relational scripts. Definitely careful individuals are much less aimed toward sensation searching for … as well as perhaps less willing to break personal norms involving monogamy.”

Generally makes sense, right? They even unearthed that, possibly counterintuitively, getting extraverted generated someone almost certainly going to feel negatively about consensual nonmonogamy, and don’t influence willingness to test it. Originally, the writers theorized that extraverts would delight in fulfilling new possible associates and undertaking associated social activities (I’m picturing dozens of poly household brunches); as a possible explanation, they observe that extraverts often care more info on a situation experiencing enjoyable than about enjoying personal interactions, ”that could be an underlying reasons why extraversion had not been related to positive attitudes toward CNM.” In addition they note that earlier study outcomes on extraversion and sexual conduct all are during the spot, and this subculture differences and norms could affect the results and need a lot more research.

Notably, they also found that, for queer individuals, how someone acts in routine contexts discloses a little more about whatever they’ll think of distinct relationships, or whether or not they’ll end up being drawn to all of them, than that individual’s style within interactions: ”perhaps, one’s accessory orientation is more regarding connection processes and high quality, whereas an individual’s individuality aspects are more effective worthy of realize attitudinal dispositions regarding varied relationships.”

This is actually the basic empirical research to look at individuality qualities and feelings towards consensual nonmonogamy among a group currently a lot more into consensual nonmonogamy. That is very cool! This study did not include exactly how perceptions about or readiness to take part in multi-partner connections translate to really having multi-partner interactions, or why is those connections successful, that is ideally a direction for future research.